This work was presented as a paste-up in the exhibition "New Tracks" at Salerno Gallery in Sydney as part of The Sydney Fringe festival in September 2012.
Facilitated by Jack Randell as part of the National Life and Landscapes project with the collaboration of: Georgia Graham, Imogen, Mariah, Claudia, Kylie and Carl Guisti, Felix Saw, Eskild Beck, Eleanor Bennett, Dave Stein, Christopher Donnison and Linda Przhedetsky, Christina Di Bona, Cate Valpiani, Elaine Jones, Brendan McCumstie, Anthony Quinn, Annette Wilson, Annabelle and Sophie Stephens, Annamarie Amu, Ana Victoria Corrales Claro, Daniel Zunzunegui, Ross and Jorja, Rod Armstrong, Rob McCormick, Peter Aland, Paul Woodhead, Milena Sallustio, newtown.grafitti, Mical Noelson, Megan Jones, Luis Vargas, Luciana Servulo, Louise Lindsay, Lily Fink, Kylie Bowles, Julia Featherstone, Jeremy Zierau, Janice Navin, James Farley, Ian Mulligan, Vicki Aland, Tonya Graham, Terry Fahy, Tamara Lawry, Sharon Zwi, Sandy Gordon-Baker, Sandra Alon, Jayne Bleechmore, Nathan Shooter
Copyright Share Alike terms of Creative Commons– http://creativecommons.org.au/learn-more/licences
Polyprosopos art through participant partitioning
Brendan McCumstie
August 2012
Sitting in a small street-side café. Looking out on an intermingle of people, a collage of opposites, passing by, I search for a common thread to hold together my understanding of the myriad faced unit that forms this collection of the sensible, this formation of a shared world, this common habitat, this weaving together of a plurality of human activity that I am a part of.
How to sew together words from the patchwork of ideas in my mind? A conceptual quilt that could cover the underlying thesis of the polyprosopos oeuvre I have been fortunate enough to be a part of. I am speaking now, not of the street in front of me, but of the artworks conceived and connected through Jack Randell and Annette Simpson.
In an attempt to tame the Cerberus of thought in my mind, I turn to order an espresso in badly intonated French (the café in which I sit is in Montparnasse, Paris). What purpose does that last bracketed statement have, other than to create jealousy? Because it is only through this, sometimes jarring, cultural and linguistic interaction that it strikes me; sitting here, talking to the wonderfully patient waiter, I am currently engaging in what is essentially a social activity, inextricably linked, on the one hand, to the existence of diversity and conflict between us, and on the other to a willingness to co-operate and act collectively to achieve a common end.
Just as my words, to the waiter, must seem heteroclite in nature. So too these montage artworks must seem, on the surface, to be a mélange in their visual treatment. Anthologized. Partitioned.
By partitioning space we define approaches for being together and apart simultaneously - dividers that have the capacity to both obscure and reveal. This process gives operating systems methods to divide and store memory, and that is precisely what these works achieve.
They manage to organize the multi-faced individual into an aesthetic mass, all the while drawing upon and presenting the comparative histories; creating a framing of experience by combining elements from different spheres of experience in a montage of artistic technique.
Whilst the curating artists act as passive governing connectors who give new visibility to the final work, it is the myriad collaborating creatives who hold the power. There exists within this dialogue an inversion of traditional class structure and as such this offers us an entry point to discuss borders. Political partitions are utilized to divide an area into parts with reference to separate areas of governance; a redistribution of space over time.
The governance, and reconnection, of the partitioned artworks by Randell and Simpson serve to remove the barriers and it is this elimination of the partition that politicizes the work, bringing into visibility the forms of connections between experience, image and meaning.
"Art is not political owing to the messages and feelings that it conveys on the state of social and political issues. Nor is it political owing to the way it represents social structures, conflicts or identities. It is political by virtue of the very distance that it takes with respect to those functions." 1
Politics, as the collective encasement of parcels of personal experience, is in activity, the search for a conflict resolution throughout which we compose, conserve and change the general convention under which we live. Resolution is the goal, not the ultimate achievement (as not all conflicts are, or ever can be, resolved), politics does not require consensus to thrive, and in fact requires diversity to flourish. It requires a collage of opposites.
The modality of these artworks creates a new resolution, a productive space offering new ways for people to relate to one another, dialogues for a new politic. A negotiation between parties that is not governed, not hierarchical, but inherently possesses procedures to allow the course of concession to take place via a collage of voices in an atonal, though not unharmonious, composition of the aesthetic.
Rather than echoing the modern desire to quest for the politic of the individual, this is a political aesthetic perceptible in the slight movements and changes of state able to be seen or noticed amidst all the subjects.
The aesthetic that exists within these works lies not in the composite concrete reality, but in the reduction of boundaries - just as the world is beautiful because of its diversity, not its homogeneity.
Within this open-ended investigation “all of us involved in the production have pointed to the subject, and taken creative action to as if to say ‘it could be like this.’”2 But, personal ambition has also been released enough to state: "its ok if it doesn’t look like my idea". That attitude, politically, is something useful these works have to offer the world.
- The Politics of Aesthetics (2006) Jacques Ranciere, Gabriel Rockhill. Interview: Janus-Face of Politicised art
- Excerpt from private conversation with Jack Randall.